High Court Of Allahabad
R.L.Gulati, C.S.P.Singh, JJ.
U.S. Awasthi And Anr. - Appellants
Vs
Inspecting Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Acquisition Range) And Anr. - Respondents
Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition 7680 of 1974
Decided on: Jul 11, 1975
INCOME TAX - Acquisition of Immovable Property - Initiation of Proceedings - Publication of Notice in Official Gazette - Mandatory Requirement - Time Limit - Non-Compliance - Jurisdiction of Competent Authority - Barred.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners purchased vacant land for a sum of Rs. 37,150.40, the price being Rs. 6.20 per sq. yard. The vendors are Sri M. L. Dave, an Assistant Secretary in the Ministry of Defence, New Delhi, and Srimati Sudha Dave, widow of late Sri C. M. Dave. The sale deed was executed and registered on 29th December, 1973. On 19th August, 1974, a notice under Section 269D(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was issued to the petitioners by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Acquisition Range, Lucknow. The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the initiation of proceedings.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the publication of the preliminary notice in the Official Gazette within a period of nine months from the end of the month in which the sale deed is registered is a mandatory requirement for the initiation of proceedings under Chapter XXA of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court further held that the publication of the notice is complete only when the Gazette containing the notification becomes available to the public.
Issues: 1. Whether the initiation of proceedings under Chapter XXA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is barred if the preliminary notice is not published in the Official Gazette within a period of nine months from the end of the month in which the sale deed is registered? 2. Whether the publication of the notice is complete when the Gazette containing the notification becomes available to the public?
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the provisions of Section 269D(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which provides that the competent authority shall initiate proceedings for the acquisition, under this Chapter, of any immovable property referred to in Section 269C by notice to that effect published in the Official Gazette. The court also relied on the decision of the Full Bench in Hiralal v. District Magistrate, Etah (Civil Misc. Writ No. 8935 of 1974, decided on 19th March, 1975 [FB]), which held that the publication of a notification was complete only when the Gazette containing the notification became available to the public.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petitions and quashed the notice dated 19th August, 1974, initiating acquisition proceedings under Section 269 of the Income-tax Act.
R.L. Gulati, J.
1. This and the connected writ petition arise out of a common set of facts and involve a common question of law and they are, therefore, being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. The petitioner No. 1, Sri U. S. Awasthi, is a practising advocate at Allahabad and petitioner No. 2 is his wife. They, along with some other persons, purchased bungalow No. 15, Sarojini Naidu Marg, Allahabad, together with the vacant land. The petitioners purchased vacant land measuring about 6,000 sq. yards for a sum of Rs. 37,150.40, the price being Rs. 6.20 per sq. yard. The vendors are Sri M. L. Dave, an Assistant Secretary in the Ministry of Defence, New Delhi, and Srimati Sudha Dave, widow of late Sri C. M. Dave. The sale deed was executed and registered on 29th December, 1973. On 19th August, 1974, a notice under Section 269D(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), was issued to the petitioners by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Acquisition Range, Lucknow. It was stated in the notice that the fair market value of the property exceeded the apparent consideration thereof by more than 15 per cent, and that the full consideration had not been shown in the sale deed, and, therefore, proceedings were being initiated under Section 269C of the Act for the acquisition of the aforesaid property. The petitioners were required to file objection, if any, in writing, within a period of 45 days from the date of the publication of the notice in the Official Gazette or within a period of 30 days from the date of the service of the notice on them whichever period expired later. The petitioners submitted a reply and later on filed the present writ petition on the ground that they were advised that the initiation of proceedings was wholly without jurisdiction and, as such, could be challenged by means of a petition. A large number of grounds have been raised but before dealing with these grounds it is necessary to notice the relevant provisions of law. Chapter XXA, covering Sections 269A to 2695, was added to the Act by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1972 (Act No. 45 of 1972), with effect from 15th November, 1972. It provides for the acquisition of immovable properties in certain cases of transfer to counteract the evasion of tax. Section 296C provides :
"269C. Where the competent authority has reason to believe that any immovable property of a fair market value exceeding twenty-five thousand rupees has been transferred by a person...... to another person...... for an apparent consideration which is less than the fair market value of the property and that the consideration for such transfer as agreed to between the parties has not been truly stated in the instrument of transfer with the object of-
(a) facilitating the reduction or evasion of the liability of the transferor to pay tax under this Act in respect of any income arising from the transfer; or
(b) facilitating the concealment of any income or any moneys or other assets which have not been or which ought to be disclosed by the transferee for the purposes of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, or this Act or the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, the competent authority may, subject to the provisions of this Chapter, initiate proceedings for the acquisition of such property under this Chapter:
Provided that before initiating such proceedings, the competent authority shall record his reasons for doing so :
Provided further that no such proceedings shall be initiated unless the competent authority has reason to believe that the fair market value of the property exceeds the apparent consideration therefor by more then fifteen per cent, of such apparent consideration."
3. Section 269D provides for a preliminary notice. Sub-section (1) says :
"(1) The competent authority shall initiate proceedings for the acquisition, under this Chapter, of any immovable property referred to in Section 269C by notice to that effect published in the Official Gazette:
Pro
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.