SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(All) 81

K.C.BHARGAVA, R.K.AGRAWAL
Trijugl Narain – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K. C. Bhargave, J.

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 12.12.1979 passed by the IV Additional Sessions Judge, Unr.ao convicting both the appellants under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing them imprisonment for life and; to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- each and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year, further convicting appellant Chunnoo alias Om Prakash under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code and :sentencing him to one year rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 500 and in default of payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months. Both the sentences are to run concurrently.

2. This unfortunate incident happened on 158.1978 at 5.00 p.m. in which one Ram Kumar is alleged to have been done to death by the appellants. The prosecution order as disclosed in the first information report is that about three years before one Mohan son of Devi been had been (murdered by one Om Prakash alias Chunnoo and Trijugi, the accused persons of the present case, and others. The father of the complainant did pairavi. On account of this en























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top