SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(All) 56

B.M.LAL, S.R.MISRA
Yaswant Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
R.G. Padia, Prakash Padia, V.M. Sahai

JUDGMENT

S. R. Misra, J.

1. By means of the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, a Schedule Caste candidate, duly selected, after qualifying in written examination and facing interview as Assistant Engineer (Civil), by U.P. Public Service Commission in the select list dared 15-1-1992, challenges the order dated 25-4-92 passed by State Government disapproving the said Select List recommended by the Commission.

2. Before we proceed to examine the case, on merits, it is necessary to summarise the facts leading to the filing of the present writ petition.

The petitioner passed his bachelor of Engineering (Civil) Examination from M.M.M. Engineering College, Gorakhpur, in the year 1987. The petitioner being admittedly a Scheduled Caste candidate, applied for the post of Assistant, Engineer (Civil), in response to an advertisement issued by The Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission (for short 'UPPSC) dated 20-6-1987 (Annexure 1 to the writ petition). The aforesaid advertisement was published in the daily newspaper on 20-6-1987. The first advertised through the aforesaid advertisement relates to Centralised Services in U. P. Palika Engineeri









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top