HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
S.K. MUKHERJEE, SURYA PRASAD, JJ.
Bhagwant - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 620 of 1983
Decided on : Jan 05, 1994
CRIMINAL APPEAL - SECTION 302, I.P.C. - FACTUAL MATRIX INVOLVING DISPUTE OVER LAND OWNERSHIP AND CULTIVATION RIGHTS - EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY - MEDICAL EVIDENCE - INVESTIGATIONAL LAPSE - FALSE IMPLICATION - ACQUITTAL OF ACCUSED.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved a dispute over land ownership and cultivation rights. The prosecution alleged that the accused, Bhagwant, Horam, Harpal, and Sompal, assaulted and shot Jagan, the son of the informant Jaspal Singh, leading to his death. Jaspal Singh and other eyewitnesses claimed to have witnessed the incident.
Finding of the Court:
The court found several inconsistencies and contradictions in the prosecution's case. The ownership and possession of the land in question were not established, and there was no evidence to support the claim that Jagan had cultivated crops on the land. The court also found discrepancies in the eyewitnesses' accounts and questioned their reliability.
Issues: 1. Whether the prosecution had established the ownership and possession of the land in question and Jagan's cultivation rights. 2. Whether the eyewitnesses' testimony was reliable and consistent. 3. Whether the medical evidence corroborated the ocular account of the incident. 4. Whether the investigation was conducted fairly and impartially.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the prosecution had failed to prove the essential elements of the offenses charged. The ownership and possession of the land were not established, and there was no evidence to support Jagan's cultivation rights. The eyewitnesses' testimony was found to be unreliable and inconsistent, and the medical evidence did not corroborate the ocular account of the incident. The court also found that the investigation was tainted by lapses and irregularities.
Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned judgment and order, and acquitted the accused of all charges. The accused were released from custody.
Surya Prasad, J.
1. This is a criminal appeal against the judgment and order dated 8th March, 1983, passed by the then learned Sessions Judge, Budaun, in Sessions Trial No. 7 of 1983 (State v. Bhagwant and others) convicting the appellant Sompal under Section 302, I.P.C. and sentencing him to the imprisonment for life and further sentencing the appellants Bhagwant, Horam and Harpal under Section 302 read with Section 34, I.P.C. and sentencing them to the imprisonment for life.
2. The prosecution case briefly stated is that Jaspal Singh (P.W. 1), son of Bhagwant Singh is a resident of village Nauna, within the circle of police station' Islamnagar, district Budaun. His son Jagan deceased was present at his house on 19th September, 1982. It was learnt that Bhagwant, resident of village Jafarpur and his sons, named, Horam and Sompal and his son-in-law named, Harpal were turning the groundnut crop with ploughs. Consequently his son reached the groundnut crop field at about 10 A.M. Jaspal Singh (P.W. 1) also followed him. They found that Horam and Harpal were turning the Bajra and groundnut crops with ploughs and that Bhagwant Singh and Sompal were sitting on the western Mend of that field. Therefore, Jagan asked them why they were turning up his crops and expressed that their litigation was going on and that they would give the field to them in the event of their success in the litigation. He asked them not to turn up the crops whereupon Bhagwant abused him, and angrily expressed that he was boasting much and that he be done to death. Consequently Sompal fired a shot from a double barrel gun at Jagan. Having received injury, Jagan ran away. In the process of his running Sompal fired second shot. Jaspal raised alarm, whereupon Bhagwant, Horam and Harpal rushed holding lathis and surrounded Jagan in the cultivated field of Prem Singh, belaboured him with lathis and caused him to fall down. It was then that Sompal fired two shots at him (Jagan). Hearing the alarm raised by Jaspal and the sounds emimated from the fire shots, Ram Autar (P.W. 2), Bhajan Lal (P.W. 4), Chharta Singh, Asha Ram and others reached the scene of occurrence and saw the entire incident. They threw challenge to the accused. Consequently the accused ran away towards west leaving the ploughs, (.lagan breached his last on the spot itself. It is further alleged that the accused generated the feelings of animosity towards Jaspal (P.W. 1) in respect of the said field. The said field which belonged to Smt. Naraini alias Bhagwati. Jaspal (P.W. I) had taken that field on payment of money in advance from her. It Is further alleged that Smt. Naraini died one and half year's back. After her death, the accused Bhagwan and others set up one Kishan Lal fictitiously as her heir and obtained an agreement from htm In respect of her land. A litigation was going on between Sukhlal, brother of Smt. Naralni and Kewal on the one side and Bhagwant and others, on the other, in connection therewith. Jaspal had deposed in that case on behalf of Sukhlal. The accused, therefore bore grudge against him.
Jaspal (P.W. 1) lodged an oral report at the police station Islamnagar, about the incident. On that basis a chick report: was prepared and an entry to that effect was made in the general diary. The case was ultimately registered against the accused. After the registration of the. case, its investigation was entrusted to the then Station Officer of the said police station, Ummed Singh (P.W. 10). Consequently he took down the statement of the informant Jaspal Singh (P.W. 1) at the police station itself. Thereafter he proceeded to the place of occurrence. Reaching there, he held inquest on the dead body of Jagan and prepared the inquest report Ext. Ka-3. He setzed, sealed and sent it to the mortuary for post-mortem examination, through the constable Sahab Singh (P.W. 5) and the village Chaukidar Ram Singh. He took the blood-stained and plain earth into his custody from the place of occurren
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.