SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(All) 171

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
V.K. KHANNA, G.P. MATHUR, JJ.
Kishori Raman Shiksha Samiti, Mathura - Appellant
Versus
Regional Deputy Director of Education, Agra - Respondent
Special Appeal No. 780 of 1993 Connected with Special Appeal No. 781 of 1993, and Special Appeal No. 782 of 1993, 816 of 1993, and C.M.W.P. No. 25142 of 1989 and 41368 of 1992
Decided on : Feb 17, 1994

Advocates appeared:
Janardan Sahai, D.P. Singh, R.K. Shukla

The panel forwarded by the Commission for the appointment of Principal does not exhaust with the appointment of a candidate, and the education authorities can utilize the panel within its life of one year, even in the event of the death of the appointed candidate.

Headnote:

EDUCATION - U. P. SECONDARY EDUCATION SERVICES COMMISSION AND SELECTION BOARDS ACT, 1982 - SECTION 11(5) - PANEL EXHAUSTION - DEATH OF CANDIDATE AFTER JOINING - APPOINTMENT OF NEXT CANDIDATE FROM PANEL - VALIDITY.

Fact of the Case:

A dispute arose regarding the appointment of the Principal of Kishori Raman Girls College, Mathura. The U. P. Secondary Education Service Commission (Commission) forwarded a panel of three candidates to the education authorities. The first candidate, Smt. Kusum Srivastava, joined the post but died within five days. The Regional Inspectress of Girls Colleges (RIGS) and the Regional Dy. Director of Education directed the management to issue an appointment letter to the second candidate, Smt. N. A. Zubairi. The Committee of Management challenged these orders, arguing that the panel had exhausted with the appointment of Smt. Kusum Srivastava and a fresh selection was required.

Finding of the Court:

The Court held that there is no statutory provision providing for exhaustion of a panel in the event of joining by a candidate. The life of a panel is one year as per Rule 7 of the U. P. Secondary Education Services Commission Rules, 1983. In this case, the panel was recommended by the Commission on January 19, 1984, and the RIGS directed the management to issue an appointment letter to Smt. Zubairi within two months, which was well within the limitation laid down by Rule 7.

Issues: 1. Whether the panel exhausts with the appointment of a candidate? 2. Whether the death of a candidate after joining the post necessitates a fresh selection?

Ratio Decidendi: The Court relied on the provisions of the U. P. Secondary Education Services Commission and Selection Boards Act, 1982, and the U. P. Secondary Education Services Commission Rules, 1983, to conclude that there is no statutory provision for exhaustion of a panel with the appointment of a candidate. The Court also considered the purpose of the Act, which is to select qualified and best available persons to improve the academic standard of institutions in the State. The Court held that the death of Smt. Kusum Srivastava within five days of joining the post should be deemed as the candidate not being available for appointment within the meaning of sub-section (5) of Section-11 of the Act, and therefore, the education authorities were justified in intimating a fresh name from the panel.

Final Decision: The Court dismissed all the Special Appeals and writ petitions. The Committee of Management was directed to abide by the orders passed by the learned Single Judge and to issue an appointment letter to Smt. N. A. Zubairi and allow her to work effectively as Principal of the institution.

JUDGMENT

G. P. Mathur, J.

1. The dispute relating to appointment on the post of Principal of Kishori Raman Girls College, Mathura gave rise to seven writ petitions and five of them were decided by a common order by the learned Single Judge, Special Appeals No. 780/93, 781/93 and 782/93 filed by the Committee of Management, Special Appeal no. 816 of 93 and Writ Petitions No. 25142/89 and 41368/92 filed by ad-hoc/officiating Principal Dr. Radha Agarwal are being disposed of by a common order at the admission stage, after hearing learned counsel for the parties,

2. It is not necessary to give the facts in detail as they have been mentioned in the judgment of learned- Single Judge Suffice it to say that on the retirement of permanent Principal Smt. Gayatri Rawat in the year 1981, the vacancy was notified and U. P. Secondary Education Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission) after following the prescribed procedure forwarded a panel consisting of (I) Smt. Kusum Srivastava (2) Smt. N. A. Zubairi and (3) Smt. Radha Tripathi, in that order to the Education Authorities on January 19, 1984. The name of Smt. Kusum Srivatava, who tood at SI. No. 1 was intimated to the management of the college under section 11 (3) of the U. P. Secondacy Education Services Commission and Selection Boards Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and an appointment letter was issued in her favour on February 24, 1984. Smt. Kusum Srivastava joined as Principal on February 25 but died on March 2, 1984. On the application of Smt. N. A. Zubairi, whose name appeared at SI. No. 2 of the panel, the Regional Inspectress of Girls Colleges Agra, passed an order on March 12, 1984 directing the management to issue an appointment letter in her favour. Subsequently, a similar direction was issued by the Regional Dy. Director of Education, Agra, on March, 16, 1985. The Committee of Management then filed writ petition No. 632 of 1985 for quashing the aforesaid orders and it is this petition which has been treated to be the leading petition by learned Single Judge as the fate of other petitioners depends upon the decision in this petition.

Shri Janardan Sahai, learned counsel for the Committee of Management (Management) after referring to the provisions of section ...9, 10 and 11 of the Act as well as Rule 2 (hh) of the U. P. Secondary Education Services Commission Rules, 1983 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules) has submitted that once a candidate recommemded by the Commission joins the post, the panel exhausts and if a vacancy occurs subsequently as a result of death of the incumbent, the same has to be notified again and the Commission has to make a fresh selection. According to the learned counsel, education authorities cannot refer back to the earlier panel as it ceases to be operative and therefore, after the death of Smt. Kusum Srivastava the Services Commission had to advertise the vacancy again and hold fresh selection. Learned counsel has elaborated his argument by placing reliance on Union of India v. Sankal Chand AIR 1977 SC 2328 (para-106) where it has been observed that the appointment means an initial entry into service for the first time and submitted that in view of sub-section (5) of Section-11 of the Act, the panel forwarded by the Commission can be utilised again only if the candidate whose name had been intimated by the education authorities has failed to join the post or such a candidate is otherwise not available for appointment. It has thus been submitted that as Smt. Kusum Srivastava had joined as principal on February 25, 1984 it is not a case where a candidate has failed to join the post or is otherwise not available for appointment and thus the necessary conditions for utilising the earlier panel did not exist. Therefore the orders dated March, 12, 1984 of R. I. G. S. and March 16, 1985 of Regional Dy. Director of Education directing the management to issue appointment letter in favour of Smt. N. A. Zubairi, whose name was at













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top