SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 1804

M.C.AGARWAL, S.RAFAT ALAM
Commissioner Of Income-Tax – Appellant
Versus
Jai Durga Construction Co. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Prakash Krishna

JUDGMENT : -

1. THIS appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), has been preferred by the Commissioner of Income-tax, Allahabad, against an order dated November 5, 1998, passed in ITA No. 2343 (Alld.) of 1993 for the assessment year 1991-92. The following substantial questions of law are stated to arise out of the said order:

"(i) Whether the Tribunal was justified in dismissing the Departmental appeal and holding that audit report was obtained before the specified date in view of the fact that it was prepared on the last date of the specified date, i.e., on October 31, 1991, and without confirming/verifying when it was obtained by the assessee in view of the fact that it was filed along with the return of income on January 20, 1992 ?

(ii) Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that audit report was obtained before the specified date as provided under Section 44AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in view of the fact that audit report (as is evident from the date given on it) itself was prepared on October 31, 1991 ?

(iii) Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that there was no requirement of law, as it stood at the relevant





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top