SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 1758

B.K.RATHI
Geeta Devi – Appellant
Versus
State Of U P – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.N.Sinha, R.K.Jain, Sandeep Saxena, Vishnu Gupta,

JUDGMENT : -

B.K. Rathi, J.

This is a petition under Section 482, Cr. P. C. with a request to quash the proceedings of Case No. 13 of 1997, State v. Shakuntala Devi, pending in the Court of City Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar under Section 133, Cr. P. C.

2. THE petitioners have alleged that they are tenants of different shops of premises No. 32/80 Mani Ram Bagiya, Kanpur Nagar of which opposite party No. 2 was the land ford and owner. That opposite party No. 2 has transferred the property in favour of opposite parties No. 3 to 7 on 24-9-98. that opposite parties are looking out some way to evict the petitioners. That instead of invoking the provisions of U. P. Act No. XIII of 1972, on the other hand, opposite party No. 2 filed an application under Section 133, Cr. P. C. before the City Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar, on which he has passed a conditional order for removal of the structure under Section 133, Cr. P. C.

The conditional order has been challenged by the learned counsel on two grounds. Firstly, that it is not a legal order and secondly, that the opposite parties should have taken recourse of the provisions of Section 21 of U. P. Act No. XIII of 1972 and cannot be permitted to get rid o











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top