SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 1743

YATINDRA SINGH
Kali Ram – Appellant
Versus
Akthar Jahan – Respondent


JUDGMENT : -

Yatindra Singh, J.

Respondents 1 to 3 filed an application for release of shop in question under Section 21 (1) of the U. P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (the Act) on the ground of personal need. This application was filed some time in the year 1992. Notice of the application was served on the petitioner in the year 1994. Thereafter application was allowed ex pane in February, 1995. Petitioner filed an application on 16th June, 1995 for setting aside the exparte order dated 17th February, 1999. This application was rejected by the Prescribed Authority on 25-3-1996. The appeal of the petitioner was also rejected on 4-10-1999, hence the present writ petition.

2. I have heard Sri Anil Bhushan holding brief of Sri Ashok Bhushan, counsel for the petitioner and Sri C. B. Singh counsel for contesting respondents. Sri Bhushan has argued that shop in question is situate in district Almorah which is in Kumaun division and that there was strike and complete 'band' in support of Uttarakhand; it is for this reason petitioner could not come to the Court and in the Court below he also filed medical certificate. The fact that there was agitation i



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top