SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(All) 1102

HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
S.L. Saraf, J.
Modi Rubber Ltd. – Appellants
Versus
Commissioner Of Income-Tax - Respondents
Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition 431 of 1982
Decided on : Sep 17, 1997

Advocates appeared:
R.S. Agrawal, Rakesh Kumar Agrawal

Sections 139(8)(a) and 217(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, providing for charging of interest, apply only in cases of regular assessment and not in the case of an assessment made pursuant to a notice issued under Section 148 of the Act.

Headnote:

INCOME TAX - Interest - Levy - Assessment under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Applicability of Sections 139(8)(a) and 217(1) - Held, Sections 139(8)(a) and 217(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, providing for charging of interest, apply only in cases of regular assessment and not in the case of an assessment made pursuant to a notice issued under Section 148 of the Act.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, an agent of a non-resident Indian, filed a return of income for the assessment year 1975-76, which was considered invalid as it was not signed by the assessee. A notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was issued, and a return was filed in response to the notice. The Income-tax Officer passed an assessment order under Section 147 of the Act, and a demand notice was issued for payment of interest under Sections 139(8)(a) and 217(1) of the Act.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the assessment order passed under Section 147 of the Act, pursuant to a notice under Section 148 of the Act, was not a regular assessment as defined under Section 2(40) of the Act. Therefore, Sections 139(8)(a) and 217(1), which provide for charging of interest, were not applicable in this case.

Issues: Whether Sections 139(8)(a) and 217(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, apply to an assessment made under Section 147 of the Act, pursuant to a notice issued under Section 148 of the Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the definition of 'regular assessment' under Section 2(40) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which includes assessments made under Section 143 or Section 144 of the Act. The court also referred to the amendment made to Section 215(6) of the Act in 1985, which clarified that assessments made under Section 147 would be regarded as regular assessments for the purposes of Sections 216, 217, and 273 of the Act. However, the court held that this amendment was not retrospective and could not be applied to the present case, which related to an assessment year prior to the amendment.

Final Decision: The court allowed the petition and quashed the demand notice issued for payment of interest under Sections 139(8)(a) and 217(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Judgment :

S.L. Saraf, J.

1. BY this writ petition a demand of Rs. 2,12,855 by way of interest has been challenged. The facts in a nutshell are as follows :

The petitioner-company was an agent of a non-resident Indian, one Scheither Walter, under Section 163 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. For the assessment year 1975-76, a return was filed by one Sri T. C. Gupta, Chief Taxation Manager of Modi Rubber Ltd. Since the said return was not a valid return as it was not signed by the assessee himself but was signed by Sri T. C. Gupta the same was considered to be non est and a notice under Section 148 of the Act was duly issued and served upon the said Sri Gupta, Chief Taxation Manager of Modi Rubber Limited, the representative of the assessee. No return in compliance with the said notice was filed till the order of reassessment was passed. As such an ex parte proceedings for the assessment was made on the basis of the information available in the earlier invalid return. The assessment was made on the total income of Rs. 5,44,820. Thereafter the petitioner moved an application under Section 146 of the Income-tax Act requesting for the cancellation of the said assessment order. The Income-tax Officer cancelled the said assessment order. Thereafter, the petitioner in pursuance of the aforesaid notice under Section 148 dated March 51, 1978, filed the return of income of Mr. Scheither Walter on March 31, 1979, declaring an income of Rs. 4,40,930. The tax as per return as per the provisions of Section140A of the Act amounting to Rs. 3,16,119 was paid by the agent on his behalf on March 30, 1979. On March 28, 1980, respondent No. 3 passed an assessment order declaring his income at Rs. 4,42,281 under Section 147 of the Income-tax Act. Along with the assessment order penalty notice under Sections 271(1)(a) and 273(b) were issued separately. It was also noted that the interest under Sections 139(8) and 217(1) is also charged. BY a subsequent demand notice a demand under Sections 139(8)(a) and 217 was issued for a total sum of Rs. 2,12,855, i.e., Rs. 1,01,536 under Section 139(8) and Rs. 1,11,319 under Section 217(1) of the Income-tax Act. The petitioner contended before this court that no liability of interest arises if an order is passed under Section 147 of the Act in response to a notice under Section 148 of the Act. The levy of interest under Section 139(8)(a) and Section217 is totally illegal and without jurisdiction and contrary to the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It was further argued that in any event in the facts and circumstances of the case there should have been a waiver of interest in the case of the petitioner under Rules 40 and 117A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. For the purposes of appreciating the arguments of the petitioner, I may here refer to the provisions of sections 139(8)(a) and 217(1) which are as under :

"139. (8)(a) Where the return under Sub-section (1) or Sub-section (2) or Sub-section (4) for an assessment year is furnished after the specified date, or is not furnished, then whether or not the Assessing Officer has extended the date for furnishing the return under Sub-section (1) or subsection (2), the assessee shall be liable to pay simple interest at fifteen per cent, per annum, reckoned from the day immediately following the specified date to the date of the furnishing of the return or, where no return has been furnished, the date of completion of the assessment under Section 144, on the amount of the tax payable on the total income as determined on regular assessment, as reduced by the advance tax, if any, paid, and any tax deducted at source :

Provided that the Assessing Officer may, in such cases and under such circumstances as may be prescribed, reduce or waive the interest payable by any assessee under this sub-section."

"217. (1) Where, on making the regular assessment, the Assessing Officer finds-

(a) that any such person as is retried to in Clause (a) of Sub-section (1) of Section209A has not sent



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top