SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(All) 157

S.N.AGGARWAL
Mohammed Idris Mekrani – Appellant
Versus
District Judge Gorakhpur – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate appeared:
Shahid Masud,

Judgment :

SUDHIR Narain, J.

1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 2-2-1995 passed by the Prescribed Authority, allowing the release application filed by the landlords-respondents 3 to 8, for release of the disputed accommodation and the order dated 15-9-1995 passed by the respondent No. 1 dismissing the Appeal against the aforesaid order.

2. THE petitioner is*a. tenant of house No. 74 Mohalla Khoonipur, Gorakhpur City. Respondents 3 to 7 are the landlords of the disputed accommodation and respondent No. 8 is holder of their power of attorney. They filed application for release of the disputed accommodation under Section 21 (1) (a) of U. P Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') on the allegation that sons of respondent No. 3, namely, Shahid and Majid are living at Bhppal but they want to carry on business in Gorakhpur city and for that purpose they require the accommodation for residential purpose. Rukhshana is the daughter of respondent No. 5 Naseer Fatma. She is living in a rented house and the disputed accommodation is required for her residential purpose. Smt. Ektesadun Nisa-respondent No.



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top