S. P. Srivastava, J.

1. Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel representing the respondents.

2. PERUSED the record.

Feeling aggrieved by the orders passed by the Additional Commissioner and the Board of Revenue in the proceedings initiated against the petitioners under the provisions contained in Section 122-B of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act whereunder accepting the recommendation of the Additional Commissioner, the Board of Revenue, has, after setting aside the order passed by the Sub- Divisional Officer dated 27-3-90 remanded the case to the Sub-Divisional Officer for deciding the same in consonance with the provisions of law keeping in view the provisions of Section 122-B (F) of U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, they have now approached this Court seeking redress praying for the quashing of the order passed by the Additional Commissioner and the Board of Revenue.

3. THE facts in brief, shorn of details and necessary for the disposal of this case lie in a narrow compass. THE petitioners had moved an application dated 20-12-88 claiming benefits contemplated under Section 122-B-4 (F) of the U. P. Zaminda