SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 584

GIRDHARI LAL
Sultan Ali – Appellant
Versus
Mansoor Ali – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. GIRDHARI Lal, J. This second appeal has been filed against the order of the learned Additional Commissioner dated 1-10- 95 by which the learned Additional Commissioner has allowed the first appeal filed by Mansoor Ali and others preferred against the order of the learned trial Court dated 26-7-88.

2. BRIEF facts of this case is that Mansoor Ali and others has filed a suit under Section 229-B of the U. P. Z. A. and L. R. Act. Plaintiff respondent has given a pedigree which is given as below: It has been stated in the plaint that plaintiff's ancestor was Alloo Shah before the time of the second settlement. The disputed land of village Karaundiya, village Harihar Ishapur and village Pyagpatti has come in the possession of his ancestors on the basis of succession. It has also been stated in the plaint that the land of village Harihar Ishapur was entered in the name of both the parties during consolidation operation. The land of village Karaundiya, and village Pyagpatti is the acquisition of Alloo Shah which has been devolved to his heirs and all the persons in the pedigree given in the plaint are in possession of the disputed land. It has also been stated that after the deat










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top