SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 1197

ANJANI KUMAR
Manoj Kumar Dwivedi – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.C.Tripathi, S.K.Srivastava

JUDGMENT : -

Anjani Kumar

1. THE petitioners, by means of present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, have prayed for the following reliefs, which are as below : "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the part of advertisement so far it stipulates of having necessary B.Ed. or C.P.Ed. degree as a regular candidate from the colleges or universities run by U. P. State only. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the merit list prepared by respondents with the further direction to prepare a fresh merit list of selection. (iii) Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. (iv) Award cost of the petition in favour of the petitioners."

2. THIS Court vide its order dated 16.6.1999, passed the following interim order : "Learned standing counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondents. He prays for and is allowed two months time to file counter-affidavit. List this petition in third week of September, 1999. The petitioner has applied for joining the course of B.T.C. The course commenced from 1st June,



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top