SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(All) 72

R.A.SHARMA
Shyam Sunder Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Tahsildar, Rudrapur District Deoria – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Shashi Nandan

Judgment

R.A. Sharma, J.

1. By means of these writ petitions, petitioners, who claim to be Lekhpal, have challenged the orders of their retirement from service at the age of 58 years. Learned counsel for the petitioners have made two submissions in support of the writ petitions, namely, (i) Rule 31 of Lekhpal Service Rules, 1958, which prescribed the age of retirement at 58 years, is ultra vires ; and (ii) Lekhpals belong to Group 'D' of the State's service and can be retired only at the age of 60 years in view of the provisions of Fundamental Rule 56. Sri M.M. Ghildiyal, learned Standing Counsel has disputed the above submissions and has pressed for dismissal of the writ petitions.

2. Due to the agitation of Patwaris though out the State, the Government of U.P. in 1953, decided to reorganise the services of Patwaris and in connection there with issued a Government Order dated 27-4-1953 (hereinafter referred to as the G.O.) according to which the cadre of Lekhpal was created in place of Patwaris. Sub-paragraph 3 of paragraph 2 of the G.O. laid down four sources for the cadre of Lekhpal. The relevant extract of the said sub-para 2 is reproduced below :-

"3. The cadre of "Lekhpal" would























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top