SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(All) 178

S.P.SRIVASTAVA
Radhey Lal – Appellant
Versus
Special Judge Bulandshahr – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
G.N. Sharma

Judgment

S.P. Stivastava, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved by an order passed by the Regional Court dismissing the application filed by the petitioner tenant seeking setting aside of an order dismissing in default a revision filed by him under section 23 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act and restoration of the revision to its original number for deciding it on merits, he has approached this court for redress.

2. The facts, shorn of details and necessary for the disposal of the present writ petition are that a suit being suit no. 60 of 1979 was filed by the landlord respondent against the petitioner claiming a decree for his ejectment from tire premises in dispute and recovery of arrears of rent and damages for use and occupation. In this suit the trial court granted the relief for the ejectment of the petitioner from the premises in dispute and the claim of the plaintiff for of recovery of arrears of rent and damages for use and occupation was granted only in part. Aggrieved by this decree the tenant petitioner filed a revision under section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act which was registered as S.C.C.R. No. 19 of 1988. This revision was dismissed In default of revisionist













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top