S.P.SRIVASTAVA
Radhey Lal – Appellant
Versus
Special Judge Bulandshahr – Respondent
S.P. Stivastava, J.
1. Feeling aggrieved by an order passed by the Regional Court dismissing the application filed by the petitioner tenant seeking setting aside of an order dismissing in default a revision filed by him under section 23 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act and restoration of the revision to its original number for deciding it on merits, he has approached this court for redress.
2. The facts, shorn of details and necessary for the disposal of the present writ petition are that a suit being suit no. 60 of 1979 was filed by the landlord respondent against the petitioner claiming a decree for his ejectment from tire premises in dispute and recovery of arrears of rent and damages for use and occupation. In this suit the trial court granted the relief for the ejectment of the petitioner from the premises in dispute and the claim of the plaintiff for of recovery of arrears of rent and damages for use and occupation was granted only in part. Aggrieved by this decree the tenant petitioner filed a revision under section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act which was registered as S.C.C.R. No. 19 of 1988. This revision was dismissed In default of revisionist
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.