SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 875

V.N.KHARE, S.RAFAT ALAM
Commissioner Of Income-Tax – Appellant
Versus
Tara Chand Suraj Mal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
S.Srivastava, Vikram Gulati

Judgment

(1.) THE Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following question of law for opinion of this court :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the sum of Rs. 24,887 did not form the trading receipts and, therefore, was not assessable income of the assessee ?"

(2.) THE assessee is a registered firm and derives income from commission agency and also from some business in its own account in the commodities, namely, sugar and arhar. THE assessee filed a return declaring a total income of Rs. 1,09,181. On scrutiny, the Income-tax Officer found that the assessee had debited a sum of Rs. 24,887 in the anamat khata realised by it towards Mandi Samiti fee from the customers, and the Income-tax Officer thus included the said amount towards the income of the assessee. On appeal, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner upheld the order of the Income-tax Officer. THE assessee, thereafter, filed a second appeal before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. THE Tribunal was of the view that since there is liability on the part of the assessee to pay mandi shulk as such the amount of Rs. 24,887 could not have been included in t


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top