SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(All) 513

M.KATJU
Hari Shankar – Appellant
Versus
IVth Addl D J Kanpur – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
D.V.Jaiswal, G.S.M.Tripathi,

Judgment

(1.) M. Katju, J. This writ petition has been filed against the impugned order, dated 31-3-1993 and 8-3-1995 (Annexures 9 and 10 to the writ petition). I have heard Shri D. V. Jaiswal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri G. M. Tripathi, appearing for the respondent landlady and find no merit in this petition.

(2.) THE landlady filed an application under Section 21 (1) (a) of U. P. Act XII of 1972 which was allowed by the Prescribed Authority and the appeal against the said order has been dismissed by the impugned order, dated 8-3-1995. Aggrieved this petition has been filed in this Court.

Admittedly the landlady is living in a tenanted house and she wants to shift into her own house. In my opinion if a landlord/landlady is living in a tenanted house then he/she has a right to live in his/her own house. It will be wholly unreasonable to compel the landlord/landlady to continue living in a tenanted house when ha/she has built/acquired his/her own house. The courts below have recorded findings of fact that the need of the landlady is bonafide and genuine and has also held that whenever there is any order of eviction the tenant, is bound to undergo hardship but this doe



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top