SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(All) 421

A.P.SINGH
Beni Madhav Upadhyay – Appellant
Versus
Inspector General (Registration) U. P. Allahabad – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Satya Narain Mishra

Judgment :

A.P. Singh

1. BY means of present writ petition, petitioner Beni Madhav Upadhyaya, Sub-Registrar, has challenged the order of his compulsory retirement dated 13-11-1991 (annexure-8 to the writ petition) and has also sought an order in the nature of Mandamus for directing respondents to treat him in service with all service benefits.

2. BRIEF facts of the case may be stated as follows.

Petitioner was appointed initially as a Camp clerk on 31st July, 1986 on which post he was confirmed on 1-4-1962. In due course, he was promoted as junior Noter and Drafter on 22-11-1979 and was confirmed on that post on 1-8-1985. Thereafter, petitioner was promoted as senior Noter and Drafter, on which post too he was confirmed on 13-11-1990 with effect from 1-8-1986. He was also promoted as Office Superintendent with effect from 1-8-1990 by order dated 13-11-1990 itself. The petitioner was then promoted as Sub- Registrar on 5-5-1991, on which post he continued to work till the date of passing of the impugned order of compulsory retirement which was passed by the Inspector General (Registration) who happens to be his appointing authority. The order was passed in exercise of the powers under




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top