SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(All) 606

OM PRAKASH, M.C.AGARWAL
Vijay Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Appropriate Authority – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kavin Gulati

JUDGMENT : -

M.C. Agarwal, J.

1. IN this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged and as agreed by the parties, the writ petition was finally heard and is disposed of by this order at the admission stage itself.

2. THE petitioner is a lessee of residential plot No, 133 in Block "A", Sector 15A, at NOIDA, District Ghaziabad. THE lessor is the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority and the area of the plot is about 465 square meters. THE petitioner entered into an agreement to sell the aforesaid plot to one Devesh Behari Saxena for a consideration of Rs. 20,21,000, vide agreement to sell dated January 22,1993. In accordance with Section 269UC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("the Act"), a statement in Form No. 37-I was filed by the petitioner and the prospective buyer. THE appropriate authority, vide order dated March 24, 1993, made an order under Section 269UD of the Act for the purchase by the Central Government of the said plot of land. It is that order which is under challenge in the present petition.

The petitioner's contention is that he is an exporter and having obtained larger export orders, he was in urgent need of mon






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top