SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 661

DHARAM VEER SHARMA
Dileep and another – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Dharam Veer, J. -

This appeal, pre­ferred by the appellant under section 374(2) of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter to be referred as CrPC), is di­rected against the judgment and order dated 6.5.1997 passed by II Additional Ses­sions Judge/Dehradun in Special Sessions Trial No. 12 of 1994/ State v. Dileep and an-atlier, whereby the accused appellants have been convicted under section 452/323/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, IPC) and in place of sentence, the accused appellants were directed to be released on probation for a period of two years on fur­nishing a personal bond or Rs. 5000/- and two sureties of similar amount by each of the accused appellants before the Probation Officer and it was further directed that if the accused appellants would fail to keep the good conduct, they shall be sentenced by the Court.

2. During the pendency of this ap­peal, Sri Arvind Vashistha, learned Coun­sel for the appellant No. 2 Ram Gopal @ Gopal filed a Criminal Miscellaneous Ap­plication No. 810/2006 stating therein that the appellant No. 2 had completed his pro­bation of sentence and, therefore, he prayed that he did not want to press the appeal in respect of app




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top