SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 2175

SUNIL AMBWANI, KASHI NATH PANDEY
Union of India and others – Appellant
Versus
Jagdish Narain Verma and another – Respondent


Advocates:
S.K.Verma, Anubhav Chandra, B.B.Paul

Sunil Ambwani and Kashi Nath Pandey, JJ. -

Heard Shri B.B. Paul, learned counsel for the petitioners. Shri Anubhav Chandra appears for the applicant-respondent No. 1.

2. The pleadings have been exchanged. With the consent of the parties, the matter was finally heard.

3. The Union of India, through General Manager, Northern Railway, New Delhi; the Divisional Railway Manager, Northern Railway, Allahabad; the Divisional Commercial Manager, Northern Railway, Allahabad and the Chief Parcel Supervisor, Kanpur Central, Kanpur, are aggrieved by the judgment of Central Administrative Tribunal dated 16.11.2007, in Original Application No. 855 of 2002, by which the Tribunal, after giving benefit of Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 (hereinafter called as P.W.D. Act, 1995), has directed the payment of gratuity to the applicant for services rendered from the year 2000, till he attained the age of 60 years. His past service as casual labour service was not qualified for counting to work out the service gratuity. The Tribunal has further awarded back wages from the date of discharge, till the applicant reached the

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top