RAKESH TIWARI, S.C.CHAURASIA
M/s. Asha Mechanical Works – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. and Ors – Respondent
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. This petition is preferred for quashing the impugned notice dated 16.7.2009 issued by the State Bank of India, Branch-Bikapur, District-Faizabad to the petitioner under Section 13(2) of Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, hereinafter referred to as "SARFAESI ACT, 2002".
3. It appears that the petitioner had applied for term loan of Rs.15 lacs and credit card limit for Rs.10 lacs from time to time under the scheme of Central Government known as Self Employment Scheme for establishing a factory for carrying on business of repairs and manufacture of machinery. During the period 2007-09 he deposited certain amounts of loan and on 16.7.2009 the Respondent-Bank issued impugned notice under Section 13 (2) of the Act.
4. It also appears that the petitioner on 2.1.2009 had moved an application to the Respondent-Bank for re-financing the factory and also moved an application on 17.12.2009 for compromise.
5. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that since the loan was taken by the petitioner for establishment of industry in connection with the agriculture, hence
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.