SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 3598

SUDHIR AGARWAL
Satish Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors – Respondent


Advocates:
C.S.C., Krishna Kumar Singh, Arvind Srivastava

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.:-

1.This matter is pending for last two years, but despite time having been granted to the respondents, no counter affidavit has been filed. The question raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner is purely legal, therefore, as agreed by learned counsel for the parties, the matter is being heard and decided finally at this stage under the Rules of the Court.

2.The submission is that lacking control over the family by one cannot constitute any misconduct at all so as to warrant the disciplinary proceedings including suspension and any instruction or action by the higher authorities in this regard would also not amount to a matter relating to service of the concerned employee attracting any disciplinary proceedings. In the case in hand, the impugned order of suspension dated 5.10.2008 has been passed by Sri S.K. Bhagat, Senior Superintendent of Police, Moradabad placing the petitioner under suspension in a contemplated enquiry on the following allegations:

@Hindi@

3.Under his instructions, the Reserve Police Inspector, Moradabad has also passed an order on 4.10.2008 directing the petitioner to vacate the official accommodation no. G 1-25 within two hours
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top