SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 4134

PRADEEP KANT, RITU RAJ AWASTHI
U. P. State Road Transport Corp. , Lucknow & Ann – Appellant
Versus
Mirza Athar Beg & Ors. – Respondent


Advocates:
Ghaus Beg, Mahesh Chandra

Hon'ble Ritu Raj Awasthi, J.:-

Heard Sri Mahesh Chandra for the appellants and Sri Ghaus Beg for the private respondent.

The special appeal has been filed with a delay of one month and twenty six day. Sri Ghaus Beg has no objection in condoning the delay.

We also feel that the delay is not such so as to deprive the appellant of hearing on merits. The delay is, therefore, condoned.

The U.P. State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation) has preferred this special appeal against the judgement and order dated 25.8.2010 passed by the learned Single Judge, by means of which the writ petition filed by the private respondent (hereinafter referred to as the respondent) claiming pension has been allowed, with a direction that he shall return the amount of Contributory Fund, received by him.

The brief facts of the case are that the respondent was appointed on the post of Conductor on 1.11.51 in the erstwhile U.P. Government Roadways (hereinafter referred to as the Roadways). He was promoted on the post of Junior Clerk w.e.f. 7.9.58 in the office of the Assistant General Manager at Charbagh Depot. His promotion was regularised on 16.4.60, as is evident from the offic

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top