SHABIHUL HASNAIN
Chintamani Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
Heard Sri Vinod Kumar Singh learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri S.B. Pandey and the learned Standing Counsel.
2. At the very outset the petitioner has stated that due to inadvertence he has failed to array 'U.P. Hindi Sansthan' as a party in the array of opposite parties. He prays that he may be permitted to add 'U.P. Hindi Sansthan' in proper format as opposite party No. 3 during the course of the day.
3. This is an innocuous prayer. It is not opposed, hence allowed.
4. U.P. Hindi Sansthan' may be arrayed as opposite party No. 3.
5. This is a case of appointment under Dying in Harness Rules. Mother of the petitioner Smt. Shobhawati Singh was a regular employee of the respondent department and she was working on the post of 'Peon' since 26.7.1985 and she died in harness on 22.9.2007, leaving behind her divorcee daughter i.e. the petitioner and the children. The petitioner applied for appointment under Dying in Harness Rules on 15.10.2007. She submitted the requisite papers and vide Annexure No. 8 to the writ petition her case was recommended to the State Government by the Director on 2.7.2008. The petitioner says that the Director was himself the app
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.