SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 3475

SHRI KANT TRIPATHI
Arvinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. and another – Respondent


Advocates:
R.C.Kandpal, O.P.Singh, Sandeep Saxena

Shri Kant Tripathi,J.:-

Heard Mr. O.P. Singh, the learned senior counsel for the petitioner and the learned AGA for the respondent no.1 and perused the record.

2. This is a writ petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing the order dated 28.4.2010 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bareilly (Annexure no.14) and the order dated 18.6.2010 passed by the Incharge Sessions Judge, Bareilly (Annexure no.16).

3. It appears that the respondent no.2, M/s Typical Tones Pvt. Ltd., which is a private limited company, through its Managing Director Mahesh Yadav, filed a criminal complaint against the petitioner in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bareilly, which was registered as complaint case no.1286 of 2008. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate examined the complainant under section 200 CrPC and also recorded the statements of PW-1 Ajay Kumar and PW-2 Hori Lal. Copies of the sale deed dated 30.7.1999 and other relevant documents were also produced by the respondent no.2. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate found that there were sufficient materials to make out a prima facie case against the petitioner under sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. Accordingly,










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top