SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(All) 460

SHRI NARAYAN SHUKLA
Bharat Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. and others – Respondent


Shri Narayan Shukla, J.;-

Heard Dr. Salil Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.P. Singh, learned Government Advocate.

2. The petitioner has challenged the proceedings of case no. 17 of 1999 arising out of Case Crime No. 581 of 1997 pending before the court of Special Judge ( Prevention and Corruption Act), Lucknow as also the order dated 3rd of March 2005 passed therein, rejecting the application, being application no. A-15, dated 6th of July, 2004 presented on behalf of the State Government under Section 321 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for withdrawal of the case pursuant to the First Information Report registered against the petitioner under Section 13(1) (E), 13 (1) (D) and 13(2) of the Anti Corruption Act, the matter is investigated and charge-sheet was filed against the petitioner. The State Government on the basis of the investigation report also sanctioned the prosecution against the petitioner by means of order dated 12th of January, 1999 on the strength of charge-sheet. Thereafter, the learned Magistrate took cognizance and proceeded with the case for trial.

3. Upon perusal of the record, it appears that the Vigilance Department re-examined the









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top