SUDHIR AGARWAL
Babu Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. and Others – Respondent
Heard Sri V.B. Shivhare, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondents as well as Sri Ram Tiwari, holding brief fro Smt Archana Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent-Bank. Challenge in this petition is recovery proceeding.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has made statement at the bar that this is the first writ petition against the recovery proceeding and this fact has also been stated in the writ petition. Petitioner has taken loan of Rs. 3,60,000/- in the year 2006. According to the petitioner, he could not pay the entire amount due to unavoidable circumstances, as stated in the writ petition, on account of which entire payable amount up to the period of last instalment, which is huge one to the tune of Rs. 6,11,660/- etc. is sought to be recovered by adopting coercive methods including the attachment and arrest. Submission is that if reasonable time is allowed to pay the amount sought to be recovered, petitioner may be able to pay the same. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, also gave an undertaking that in case, he is allowed to pay the amount under recovery in some easy ins
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.