SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(All) 1955

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Sudhir Agarwal, J.
Jawahar Lal -Appellant
Versus
State of U.P.and Others -Respondent
C.M.W.P.No.38105 of 2011
Decided On : 13-07-2011

Advocates:
Counsel for the Petitioner:Ashatosh TripathI, Counsel for the Respondents: C.S.C.

The appellate forum had jurisdiction over disputes regarding the issuance of caste certificates, and the time limit for deciding an appeal was not mandatory.

Headnote:

Caste Certificate - Appellate Forum - The court held that the appellate forum constituted by the State Government for deciding disputes relating to caste certificates was not limited to service matters and had jurisdiction over disputes regarding the issuance of caste certificates by competent authorities. The court also clarified that the time limit of 30 days for deciding an appeal by the forum was not mandatory and would not vitiate the appeal if not adhered to.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner contended that the appellate forum constituted by the State Government for deciding disputes relating to caste certificates was not competent to decide the matter and that the appeal had not been decided within the prescribed 30 days.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the appellate forum had jurisdiction over disputes regarding the issuance of caste certificates and that the time limit of 30 days for deciding an appeal was not mandatory and would not vitiate the appeal if not adhered to. The court directed the appellate forum to decide the appeal within 15 days.

Issues: Jurisdiction of the appellate forum and the effect of not deciding the appeal within the prescribed time limit.

Ratio Decidendi: The appellate forum had jurisdiction over disputes regarding the issuance of caste certificates, and the time limit of 30 days for deciding an appeal was not mandatory and would not vitiate the appeal if not adhered to.

Final Decision: The writ petition was disposed of, directing the appellate forum to decide the appeal within 15 days from the date of production of a certified copy of the order.

Sudhir Agarwal, J.;-

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that dispute relating to caste certificate in the present matter would not have been referred to appellate Forum constituted by State Government vide Government Order dated 27th January, 2011, inasmuch as, the said forum was constituted only for deciding dispute in respect to service matter and not for other matters. He further contended that said Government Order prescribes limitation of 30 days for deciding an appeal by the Forum and in the present case appeal has not been decided within thirty days. Therefore, the appellate Forum cease to have any jurisdiction in the matter.

2. In my view, both the submissions have no force. It is true that this Court when confronted with a large number of cases involving serious factual dispute regarding issuance of caste certificate, made an observation that against the orders passed by the competent authority for issuing caste certificate, an appellate Forum ought to have been constituted so that such factual dispute may not come to this Court consuming valuable time of this Court in such matters, which ought to have been decided by a Forum of much lower level so that precious time of this Court may be utilized in deciding constitutional matter and other substantial matters. Consequently, State Government has constituted such a Forum and Government Order dated 27th January, 2011 has been issued.

3. A bare reading of aforesaid Government Order clearly shows that it has been issued to consider the dispute relating to issuance of caste certificate by the District Magistrate, Deputy Collector, Tehsildar or any other competent authority. Submission that aforesaid Forum therefore was confined only for the caste certificate disputed in service matter is misconceived. Moreover, caste certificate issuing authority is not to consider as to for what purpose the same is issued and at that time only thing which is in the mind of the authority concerned is whether the person belong to that caste or not and what would be the purpose and objective and how it would be used by the person concerned is wholly irrelevant.

4. The second aspect, whether failure on the part of the appellate Forum in deciding the matter within thirty days would vitiate the appeal is also untenable, inasmuch as, once an appeal has been preferred before competent Forum, it has to be decided in one or the other way. It is true that the State Government has required the appellate forum to decide the appeal latest within 30 days from the date of filing of appeal but this time period cannot be held to be mandatory, inasmuch as, its consequence would have to be considered. In case, the appeal is not decided within 30 days, neither it results in automatic dismissal of appeal nor in allowing it. Some decision has to be taken by the Forum in one or the other way. Long time in disposal by appellate Forum cannot be appreciated and appellate authority must keep in mind that caste certificate has to be utilized by a person concerned for some important aspect which needs an early decision in the matter. Therefore, any deliberate or lackadaisical attitude on the part of appellate Forum in deciding appeal expeditiously has to be condemned. But considering the objective, purpose and consequence with respect to failure on the part of the appellate Forum in not deciding the appeal, I have no hesitation in holding that the aforesaid direction contain in para 5 of Government Order will not vitiate/result/make the appeal ineffective.

5. In the present case, appeal appears to have been filed before Commissioner on 15th June, 2011 whereupon it was heard for admission and after admitting the same, Commissioner fixed 6th July, 2011.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner informed that on 6th July, 2011 due to non sitting, the appeal was adjourned. Considering the nature of the matter involved, it goes without saying that the appellate forum has to decide the matter expeditiously and should not


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top