Heard Sri Nitin Kumar Agrawal learned counsel for the revisionist.

2. This is a Civil Revision filed under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Causes Act against the judgment and order dated 18.2.2011 passed in Rent Control Case no. 1 of 2009 (Rakesh Kumar Vs Satnam Singh) by the Prescribed Authority/A.C.J.M. Anoopshahar, District Bulandshahar. This revision has been filed by the defendant.

3. By the order dated 18.2.2011 the application 26-A filed by the defendant revisionist has been rejected. The application made by the revisionist was for summoning the plaintiff respondent for being cross examined on the affidavit filed by the plaintiff respondent in evidence. The court below has rejected the application on two grounds. The first is that it has not been stated in the application 26-A by the revisionist defendant as to what is the contradiction in the affidavit in evidence filed by the plaintiff respondent. Secondly it has recorded that in case the averments of the affidavit in evidence filed by the plaintiff respondent is denied by the defendant revisionist he can always file an affidavit in rebutal or denial.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed relia