SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 3901

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Prakash Krishna, J.
Rohit Tulsiyani -Appellant
Versus
Bhagwati Prasad Sharma -Respondent
Civil Revision No. 473 of 2009
Decided On : 02-11-2010

Advocates:
Counsel for the Petitioner:K.D. Tripathi., Counsel for the Respondent: Madhav Jain.

The main legal point established is the court's discretion to grant the defendant-tenant another opportunity to file the written statement in the interest of justice, subject to the payment of heavy cost.

Headnote:

Revision - Small Causes Courts Act - The court allowed the revision filed by the defendant-tenant, setting aside the order of the Trial Court and directing the defendant-tenant to appear before the Court, file the written statement, and deposit a sum of Rs. 10,000 as costs within a stipulated time.

Fact of the Case:

The defendant-tenant filed a revision against the Trial Court's order dismissing the application to take the written statement on record, after the suit for recovery of arrears of rent and ejectment was filed by the opposite party.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that in the interest of justice, the defendant-tenant should be granted one more opportunity to file the written statement, subject to payment of heavy cost. The court directed the defendant-tenant to appear before the Court, file the written statement, and deposit a sum of Rs. 10,000 as costs within a stipulated time.

Issues: The issues involved the refusal of the tenant-applicant to accept the summons, the dismissal of the application to take the written statement on record, and the interest of justice in granting the defendant-tenant another opportunity to file the written statement.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the entire facts and circumstances of the case and decided to grant the defendant-tenant another opportunity to file the written statement, subject to the payment of heavy cost, in the interest of justice.

Final Decision: The court allowed the revision, setting aside the Trial Court's order and directing the defendant-tenant to appear before the Court, file the written statement, and deposit a sum of Rs. 10,000 as costs within a stipulated time.

Prakash Krishna, J.-

The present revision has been filed under sec­tion 25 of the Provincial Small Causes Courts Act against the order dated 14th July, 2009 whereby the Trial Court has/ejected the application 17-C filed by the present applicant who is defendant in S.C.C. Suit No. 58 of 2008. The said suit has been filed by the opposite party herein for recovery of arrears of rent and ejectment etc. against the present applicant. Summons were issued by ordinary post as well as registered post. According to the report, the tenant-appli­cant refused to accept the summons and therefore, the Court ordered that the suit may proceed ex parte. Thereafter, application No. 17-C was filed by the present applicant to take the written statement on record. The said application has been dismissed by the order under revision.

2. Heard Shri K.D. Tripathi, learned Counsel for the applicant and Shri Madhav Jain, learned Counsel for opposite party.

3. It is true that the defendant-tenant has not filed any affidavit or any other material to challenge the findings recorded by the Court below and en­dorsement of refusal on the registered letter containing the summons. But in the interest of justice, as prayed by the applicant one more opportunity be granted to file the written statement subject to payment of heavy cost.

4. Shri Madhav Jain, learned Counsel for opposite party very fairly states that if the suit is going to be decided shortly, he may not have any seri­ous objection.

5. Taking into consideration the entire facts and circumstances of the case, the applicant-tenant is directed to appear before the Court below on 22nd November, 2010 alongwith certified copy of this order and shall file the writ­ten statement on that date. The defendant-tenant shall also deposit a sum of Rs. 10,000/- as costs on or before that date before the Trial Court. If the applicant fulfills the condition as stipulated above within the stipulated time, the order dated 13th October, 2009 shall stand set aside and the Trial Court will take the written statement on record. The Trial Court then proceed to dispose of the suit expeditiously, preferably within a period of one year from the date of fil­ing of certified copy of this order.

6. By way of clarification, it is added that if the applicant fails to com­ply with any of the conditions stipulated above within stipulated time, the present revision shall stand dismissed.

7. Subject to above, the present revision succeeds and is allowed. The order dated 13th October, 2009 is set aside.

Revision Allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top