ANIL KUMAR
Bhupendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda and others – Respondent
Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel on behalf of respondent and perused the record.
2. Brief facts of present case are to the effect that petitioner has been granted licence of D.B.B.L. Gun having licence No. 605 by the competent authority in the year, 1999. On 04.04.2009, the Licencing Authority issued a show-cause-notice to the petitioner to submit his reply why his arm licence should not be cancelled, submitted his reply on 04.05.2009, thereafter on 10.12.2009, the District Magistrate, Gonda/Licencing Authority cancelled the Arms licence of petitioner.
3. Aggrieved by the same, petitioner filed an appeal (registered as appeal no. 234/158) under Section 18 of Arms Act, before the appellate authority/Commissioner, Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda, dismissed vide order dated 23.06.2010, hence present writ petition has been filed challenging the aforesaid orders.
4. After heard learned counsel for parties and going through the record, it transpires that appellate order passed in Appeal No. 234/158 is non-speaking order and no reason has been assigned while rejecting the appeal preferred by the appellant-petitioner.
5. Needless to mention herein that it
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.