SHRI NARAYAN SHUKLA
Sitawati – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. and others – Respondent
Heard Mr. Ramesh Kumar Srivastava, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal, learned Counsel for opposite party No. 3 as well as Mr. Rajendra Kumar Dwivedi, learned Additional Government Advocate for the opposite parties 1 and 2.
2. The petitioner Smt. Sitawati through her next friend husband Mr. Sameer Arya, claims her illegal detention by respondent No. 3, on the ground that they have married to each other, whereas upon perusal of the record, I find that one First Information Report No. 340 of 2010, as Case Crime No. 431 of 2010, under section 364 IPC, has been registered at Police Station Chinhat, district Lucknow, against unknown persons for missing of Km.. Sitawati. Subsequently the complainant came to know that she has been kidnapped by Sameer, Waseem @ Bharti and his father Jameel Ahmad Siddiqui, on the basis of which the police came into motion and recovered the girl from their custody and produced before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Lucknow. She was also medically examined. The medical certificate, High School certificate, marriage certificate as well as the religion transfer certificate were produced bef
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.