SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 1985

PRAFULLA C.PANT
Himanshu Gava and another – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttaranchal and others – Respondent


Prafulla C. Pant, J.:-

By means of this petition moved under section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (for short Cr.P.C), the petitioners have sought quashing of the proceedings of the criminal complaint case no. 1163 of 2003, Pushkar Mal & others vs. Himanshu Gava & others, relating to offence punishable under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rudrapur, District, Udham Singh Nagar.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused papers on record.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the respondent no. 2 and respondent no. 3 filed a criminal complaint no. 1163 of 2003, before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar against the petitioners and M/s Gava Rice Mill with the pleading that the complainants are dealing with the peddy business. The accused purchased peddy from the complainants, and towards part payment of the price, the cheque no. 407370 signed by petitioner no. 1 was issued for an amount of Rs. 2,50,000/-. When said cheque was presented before the bankers, same was dishonoured with the endorsement “insufficient funds”. On this, the complainant gave a notice to the petitioner no. 1, and when with




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top