UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Prafulla C.Pant, V.K.Bist, JJ.
Abbal Singh Bhandari -Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand -Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 183 of 2010
Decided On : 25-3-2011
Dowry Death - Criminal Procedure - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 304-B - The court discussed the relevant provisions of Section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code, which defines dowry death and the necessary ingredients to constitute an offense under this section. The court highlighted the requirement of proving unnatural death and the lack of evidence to establish the offense in the present case.
Fact of the Case:
The deceased, Pramila, was alleged to have died due to cruelty for non-fulfillment of dowry demands. The prosecution failed to prove that the death was unnatural or that the accused had subjected the deceased to cruelty or harassment for dowry.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution did not prove the charges of offenses punishable under Section 498-A and 304-B of the Indian Penal Code against the accused. It was established that the deceased suffered from epilepsy and likely died due to the disease, which cannot be considered an unnatural death.
Issues: The issues revolved around the proof of unnatural death, demand of dowry, and harassment for non-fulfillment of dowry demands.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the prosecution failed to establish the necessary elements to constitute the offenses under Section 498-A and 304-B of the Indian Penal Code, and the presumption under Section 113B of the Indian Evidence Act did not apply.
Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the conviction and sentence against the accused were set aside. The accused was acquitted of the charges and ordered to be set at liberty.
This appeal, preferred under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short Cr.P.C.), is directed against the judgment and order dated 31.07.2010 / 02.08.2010, passed by Sessions Judge, Chamoli, in Sessions Trial No. 20 of 2008, whereby accused / appellant Abbal Singh Bhandari has been convicted under Section 304-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short I.P.C.), and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life.
2) Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the lower court record.
3) Prosecution story, in brief, is that accused / appellant Abbal Singh Bhandari got married to Pramila (deceased) in the year 2006. She (Pramila) died on 29.04.2008 in her husband's house in Village Dewar Khadora, within the limits of police station Kotwali Chamoli. After her death, P.W. 1 Jasveer Singh, brother of the deceased, lodged first information report (Ext. A -1) that his sister (Pramila) was subjected to cruelty for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry before her death. The complainant (P.W. 1) suspected that accused / appellant Abbal Singh has murdered his wife. On the basis of said report, Crime No. 209 of 2008 was registered at police station Chamoli (Kotwali) against accused / appellant Abbal Singh Bhandari (husband of the deceased), in respect of offence punishable under Section 304-B of I.P.C., and check report (Ext. A -14) was prepared. The investigation was taken up by Dr. Jagdish Chandra, Dy. Superintendent of Police (P.W. 9). On 29.04.2008, at about 04:10 P.M., dead body of the deceased was taken into possession by the police, and inquest report (Ext. A -2) was prepared. Other necessary papers viz. sketch of the dead body (Ext. A -5), police form No. 13 (Ext. A -6), sample seal (Ext. A -7), and letter to the Chief Medical Officer (Ext. A -8) were also prepared, and dead body of Pramila was sent in sealed condition for postmortem examination. On 30th of April 2008, Dr. V.P. Singh (P.W. 5) conducted postmortem examination on the dead body of Pramila. Though, he observed as many as six minor ante mortem injuries like abrasions, but opined that cause of death could not be ascertained. In the autopsy report (Ext. A -3) he observed that viscera was preserved. Meanwhile, the Investigating Officer interrogated the witnesses, inspected the spot, and prepared site plan (Ext. A -9). After completion of investigation, charge sheet (Ext. A -11) was filed by the Investigating Officer, against accused / appellant Abbal Singh Bhandari, in respect of offences punishable under Section 498-A and 304-B of I.P.C. After submission of charge sheet, report of Forensic Science Laboratory, Agra, was received in respect of viscera preserved, reporting that no chemical poison was found in stomach, piece of intestine, piece of liver, one kidney, spleen and piece of lung.
4) The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chamoli, on receipt of the charge sheet in the month of June 2008, after giving necessary copies to the accused, as required under Section 207 of Cr.P.C., committed the case to the court of sessions for trial. Learned Sessions Judge, Chamoli, on 2nd of August 2008, after hearing the parties, framed charge of offence punishable under Section 498-A, and one punishable under Section 304-B of I.P.C. against accused Abbal Singh Bhandari, who pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. On this, prosecution got examined P.W. 1 Jasveer Singh (informant and brother of the deceased); P.W. 2 Virendra Singh Aswal; P.W. 3 Rajeev Singh Mehta; P.W. 4 Parwati Devi (mother of the deceased); P.W. 5 Dr. V.P. Singh (who conducted the postmortem examination); P.W. 6 Sudarshan Singh (declared hostile); P.W. 7 Bhupati Raj Naib Tehsildar (who prepared inquest report); P.W. 8 Pratap Singh (declared hostile); P.W. 9 Dr. Jagdish Chandra (who investigated the crime); P.W. 10 Sub Inspector Shanti Godiyal (arresting officer); and P.W. 11 Head Constable Kunwar Singh Negi (who prepared check report of the basis of FIR). The oral and documentary
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.