SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(All) 1092

B.C.KANDPAL, NIRMAL YADAV
Ram Manohar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


B.C. Kandpal, J.:-

Since all the above four appeals arise out of the same judgment and order and similar ques­tion of fact of law is involved, they are being decided by this common judg­ment.

All the appeals arise out against the common judgment and order 13.5.2004 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/F.T.C.VI Dehradun, in Sessions Trial No. 33 of 2003, State v. Ramesh and others, whereby the learned Sessions Judge convicted accused/appellants Ramesh, Ram Manohar and Jai Chandra under sections 396, 412, 201, I.P.C. The Sessions Judge while convicting the said accused/appellants under section 396 I.P.C. sentenced them to undergo life imprisonment and fine of Rs. 10,000/- each and in default of payment of fine they were directed to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year each. The Sessions Judge while convict­ing the said accused/appellants under section 412 I.P.C. sentenced them to un­dergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and fine of Rs. 10,000/- each and in default of payment of fine they were directed to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year each. The Sessions Judge while convicting the said accused/appellants under section 201 I.P.C. sentenced them to und









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top