PRAKASH KRISHNA
Santosh Kumari Anand – Appellant
Versus
U. P. Power Corpn. Vidyut Transmission Khand – Respondent
This is plaintiff-landlady's revision under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Causes Courts Act. It arises out of SCC Suit No. 31 of 2001 which has been dismissed by the trial court vide judgment and decree dated 6th January, 2007.
2. The dispute relates to 79, Tagore Town, Allahabad of which the plaintiff is admittedly owner and landlady. She let it out on monthly rent of Rs.2100/- under rent agreement to the defendant-tenant opposite party herein, for a period of-five years i.e. 01.06.1985 to 31.05.1990. It appears that the defendant-tenant continued to pay the rent at the rate of Rs.2100/- per month, even after expiry of the aforesaid period. Thereafter, the plaintiff terminated the tenancy of the defendant-tenant and filed suit giving rise to the present revision. Eviction was sought for on the groun that the provisions of U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 are not applicable as there is above Rs.2000/- per month and secondly, the defendant-tenant ha disfigured the building by raising constructions.
3. The trial court has found that the provisions of U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972 are not applicable but since there was renewal clause in the agreement between the parties and th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.