SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 448

DEVENDRA KUMAR ARORA
Ram Chandra – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. and Others – Respondent


Advocates:
Sri Nand Pratap Ojha, Advocate, for the Petitioner.

Devendra Kumar Arora, J.;-

By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ in the nature of mandamus for commanding the opposite parties to give appointment under the Uttar Pradesh Recruitment of Dependant of Government Servant Dying in Harness Rules, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as Dying in Harness Rules.).

The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner's father Late Gaya Prasad was appointed on muster roll temporary basis and was working at Itaunja Kumhrawan Road in Sthanik Abhiyanta 2nd P.W.D., Lucknow. Thereafter, petitioner's father was transferred to Executive Engineer, Nirman Khand-2 P.W.D., Chhatauni, Dehras Road, Gonda and while working there he died on 17.08.1994. The petitioner's mother made application for compassionate appointment of petitioner on 10.04.1995. When no action was taken by opposite parties, the petitioner made several representation, raising his grievance, but till date no action has been taken by the opposite parties to provide compassionate appointment to the petitioner.

Learned Standing Counsel while opposing writ petition, submitted that the petitioner's father was appointed on muster roll temporary basis an

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top