SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(All) 3101

BARIN GHOSH, U.C.DHYANI
Jagdish – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


U.C. Dhyani, J.;—

This appeal, preferred under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is directed against the judgment and order dated 05.02.2002, passed by Addl. Sessions Judge / F.T.C. First, Nainital in Sessions Trial No. 453 of 1996, whereby accused / appellant Jagdish has been convicted under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and sentenced to imprisonment for life, and directed to pay fine of ` 2,000/- in default of payment of which he has been further directed to undergo imprisonment for a period of six months.

2. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant & learned Addl. Government Advocate for the State and perused the lower court record.

3. Prosecution story, in brief, is that P.W.1 Joga Ram (informant) is resident of Shivnathpur, Nai Basti, police station Ramnagar, District Nainital. On 10.01.1996, at about 06:00 P.M., Kundan Lal s/o informant Joga Ram proceeded from his house towards Dhela Barrage to take battery, and on his way he stopped at the shop of Umed Ram to purchase peanuts. At that time accused Ramesh, Jagdish and Pooran reached there. Another villager Anand s/o Ganga Ram was also there. By that time, Joga Ram (informant) and his nephew Diwa









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top