DEVI PRASAD SINGH, SAEED-UZ-ZAMAN SIDDIQI
Ruby – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. and others – Respondent
Petitioner, who is a practicing advocate, is the victim of communal riot living in the city of Lucknow falling within Saadatganj, Police Station. An FIR was registered with regard to the incident but till date accused persons have not been arrested despite repeated orders of this court on 8.2.2012, 15.3.2012 and 5.4.2012.
2. Learned Standing Counsel states that proceedings under Section 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. have been initiated but the activists could not be apprehended.
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that it is routine feature in the jurisdiction of Saadatganj, Police Station where communal riots take place almost every year. In such a situation, it is incumbent upon the government to strengthen the security measure and maintain communal harmony. Sufficient forces should be deployed in the different outposts of Saadatganj Police Station where communal riots take place every year. Posting of one or two police officials shall not serve the purpose.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that every year peace breaks and communal riots take place and police fails to take adequate action for compelling reasons. In such
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.