Heard Shri Ajay Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned State Counsel and perused the record.

Shri Ajay Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by judgment and order dated 22.11.2010 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.4731 of 2011 "Muni Raj vs. State of U.P.", the same on reproduction reads as under:-

"Heard Shri Deepak Kumar Singh learned Advocate holding brief of Shri Ajay Pratap Singh and learned Standing counsel.

The petitioner has challenged the order dated 27.11.2009 passed by the S.D.M. Dhampur, District Bijnore in Case No. 10 of 2009, State of U.P. Vs Tarawati under Section 33/39 L.R.Act. The petitioner alleges that he was alleged lease holder through Annexure No.3. The lease was granted in his favour on 02.02.1972. By the impugned order of the S.D.M. Dhampur dated 27.11.2009, the said lease has been cancelled and the entries in Revenue record in favour of petitioner has also been cancelled. The petitioner has challenged the order solely on one ground that no opportunity of hearing is given in the enquiry conducted by the Tahsildar. He says that only