SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 3202

ANIL KUMAR
Surendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. and Others – Respondent


Advocates:
S. M. Waseem.
Counsel for the Respondents:
R. N. Guta , C.S.C.

Hon'ble Anil Kumar,J.:—

Heard Sri S.M. Waseem , learned counsel for the petitioner, learned State Counsel as well as Sri R.N.Gupta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Gaon Sabha.

Facts, in brief , of the present case are that the land recorded in Gata No. 511-0.101 and 571-0.229 as per version of the petitioner was allotted to him on 11.8.2004 by the Land Management Committee of the village Panchayat under Section 198(1) (c ) of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 ( hereinafter referred to as 'Act') as he is a landless labourer, belonging to backward class living below the poverty line.

However, the same was cancelled on the basis of Lekhpal report dated 19.3.2008 ( Annexure no.3) by opposite party no.3/Additional Collector, Sitapur on 29.6.2011.

Aggrieved by the said fact, petitioner for redressal of his grievance , filed a revision ( Revision No. 3 of 2010-11, Surendra Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and others) under Section 333 of the Act, dismissed by opposite party no.2/ Additional Commissioner( Judicial) Lucknow Division, Lucknow vide order dated 7.9.2012 ( Annexure no.4).

Learned counsel for the petitioner has challenged the impugned orders on the ground that the

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top