SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(All) 178

SURENDRA VIKRAM SINGH RATHORE
Hema Pathak – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. and Others – Respondent


Advocates:
Sri A,P. Ojha, Advocate, for Petitioner.
CSC, for Respondents.

Surendra Vikram Singh Rathore, J.—

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

2. By means of instant writ petition, the petitioner has made the following prayer:-

"(i) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties to grant pension of the petitioner with effect from 1.7.2003 in the pay scale admissible to the post of Assistant Teacher of L.T. Grade, on which she was promoted by the Committee of Management of the College, in accordance with law;

(ii) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties to pay and disburse the arrears of salary for the period from 19.5.2003 to 30.6.2003 and the arrears of regular pension payable to the petitioner with effect from 1.7.2003 along with interest @ 18% per annum;

(iii) a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 24.5.2007 passed by the opposite party no.3, as contained in Annexure No.9 to the writ petition."

3. Brief facts necessary for disposal of the instant writ petition are that the petitioenr was appointed as Assistant Teacher (B.T.C. Grade) in Primary Section of Sahai Singh Balika Vidyala













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top