SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(All) 2416

A.P.SAHI
Suryajeet Rajbhar & Anr. – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. & Ors. – Respondent


Advocates:
L. D. Rajbhar, Tara Chand Kaushal, for Petitioners
C.S.C., for Respondents

Amreshwar Pratap Sahi, J.;—

Heard Sri L.D. Rajbhar and Sri Tara Chand Kaushal, learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the records.

These two petitioners before this Court are aggrieved by the action of the Respondents not allowing the petitioners to attend the counselling which was scheduled to be held with effect from 14th July, 2012 in relation to engineering courses to which admission is granted under a joint entrance examination conducted by the respondent-State Government.

The petitioners contend that they have qualified in the entrance examination but they further claimed the benefit of reservation claiming themselves to be belonging to the "Bhar" caste which according to them is a denotified tribe and is of the same status and equivalent to a Scheduled Tribe.

The brochure under which the said entrance examination has been conducted notifies that reservation for denotified tribes in the entrance examination is not permissible and denotified tribes are not recognized as scheduled tribes.

The petitioners contend that this provision in the brochure is unconstitutional and is even otherwise unsupportable by law, as such, the petitioners deserve the benefit of reservation trea












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top