SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(All) 1441

ANIL KUMAR
Rakesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
District Magistrate, Raebareli and Others – Respondent


Advocates:
Sri R.B.S. Rathur, Advocate, for Petitioner.
CSC, for Respondents.

Anil Kumar, J.—

Head Sri R.B.S. Rathour, learned counsel for petitioner, learned State counsel and perused the record.

Petitioner as per the provisions as provided under Section 13 of the Arms Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been granted a licence for DBBL gun and licence No. is 272/97.

On 27.04.1999, an F.I.R. under Section 506 IPC has been lodged against the petitioner and some other persons by Sri Rakesh Singh Rana, accordingly a Criminal Case No.120 A of 1999 has been registered against him.

Keeping in view the said facts, a recommendation has been made by the police authorities of District Raebareli for suspension of the arms licence of the petitioner in respect of DBBL Gun No. 1664. Accordingly, the impugned order/show cause notice dated 17.06.1999 has been issued to him suspending his arms licence by the O.P. No. 3/Prabhari Adhikari (Arms), Raebareli, petitioner was directed to file his reply why the same be not cancelled.

Sri R.B.S. Rathour, learned counsel for petitioner while challenging the impugned order submits that the same is in contravention to the provisions of Section 17 (3) of the Arms Act as well as the law laid down by this Court in the case of Sa







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top