SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(All) 1694

ANIL KUMAR
Thakur Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. and Others – Respondent


Advocates:
Sri Santosh Kr. Tripathi, Advocate, for Petitioner.
CSC, for Respondents.

Anil Kumar, J.—

Heard Sri S.K. Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and perused the record.

By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 19.09.2006 passed by District Magistrate, Raebareli thereby cancelling the petitioner's arms licence under Section 17(3) of the Arms Act and the order dated 27.01.2010 passed by Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow thereby dismissing the petitioner's appeal.

Facts in brief of the present case are that the petitioner has been granted an Arms licence in the year 1987 in respect to DBBL gun having licence No. 2407.

On 28.12.2005, a report has been submitted against the petitioner by the concerned police station that the petitioner has misused his gun in an incidence and in respect to the said incidence a case has been registered against the petitioner (Case No. 65/2005 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 504, 506, 307, 436 I.P.C. .

In view of the abovesaid facts, the gun licnece of the petitioner has been suspended and on 25.02.2006 and a show cause notice has been issued to him to submit his reply to which he submitted his reply.

On 19.09.2006, the matter has come up for heari
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top