SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(All) 725

KRISHNA MURARI
Sallu Baj – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. and Others – Respondent


Advocates:
Sri Vijay Gautam, for the petitioner
C.S.C., for the respondents.

Krishna Murari, J.;—

Heard Shri Vijay Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

2. These are two connected writ petitions filed by the same petitioner and, hence, are being decided by this common judgment.

3. By means of Writ Petition No. 27252 of 2010, challenge has been made to the notice dated 21.04.2010 issued to the petitioner to show cause why the appointment obtained by him fraudulently and illegally be not cancelled. Writ Petition No. 56069 of 2011 has been filed challenging the order dated 01.06.2010 passed by the Commandant, 15th Battalion, PAC, Agra cancelling the appointment as well as orders dated 04.05.2011 and 30.08.2011 dismissing the appeal and revision.

4. Facts in brief giving rise to the dispute are as under.

5. Petitioner was appointed as Constable in Provincial Armed Constabulary (for short 'PAC') on 01.04.1992 on a permanent post after having cleared the requisite physical, written as well as medical examination. Petitioner, along with the application form, had submitted a certificate certifying him to be a member of Scheduled Tribe category and, accordingly, he was accorded benefit of reservation policy. A show c















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top