KRISHNA MURARI
Sallu Baj – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. and Others – Respondent
Heard Shri Vijay Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
2. These are two connected writ petitions filed by the same petitioner and, hence, are being decided by this common judgment.
3. By means of Writ Petition No. 27252 of 2010, challenge has been made to the notice dated 21.04.2010 issued to the petitioner to show cause why the appointment obtained by him fraudulently and illegally be not cancelled. Writ Petition No. 56069 of 2011 has been filed challenging the order dated 01.06.2010 passed by the Commandant, 15th Battalion, PAC, Agra cancelling the appointment as well as orders dated 04.05.2011 and 30.08.2011 dismissing the appeal and revision.
4. Facts in brief giving rise to the dispute are as under.
5. Petitioner was appointed as Constable in Provincial Armed Constabulary (for short 'PAC') on 01.04.1992 on a permanent post after having cleared the requisite physical, written as well as medical examination. Petitioner, along with the application form, had submitted a certificate certifying him to be a member of Scheduled Tribe category and, accordingly, he was accorded benefit of reservation policy. A show c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.