SHABIHUL HASNAIN
Sumitra Verma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India and Others – Respondent
Heard Sri Ram Chandra holding brief of Sri Gauri Shankar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing counsel for Union of India.
2. Petitioner has filed this writ petition praying for a writ of mandamus directing the opposite parties to allow family pension and other dues of her late husband to her. Petitioner is the wife of late Acharya Dev Verma, who was an employee of Census Department at Lucknow. He died in harness on 19.2.2003.
3. Petitioner has been running from pillar to post to get legal dues released in her favour. In this regard, supplementary affidavit has been filed by the petitioner annexing two letters dated 31st March, 2011 as well as 21st April, 2011 written by one Sri R.S.Meena, Deputy Director (Admn.). By the first letter, the officer concerned has very categorically mentioned that in case the petitioner takes back the present writ petition, her case will be decided and the dues will be given. Later on, by the second letter, he once again emphasized that since the proposal of the government has not been accepted by the petitioner, her dues are not being paid.
4. This is appalling kind of statement which has left the Court dumb foun
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.