RAM SURAT RAM (MAURYA)
Rana Pratap Pal – Appellant
Versus
D. D. C. and Others – Respondent
Heard Sri Narsingh Pandey for the petitioner and Sri Uma Nath Pandey for the respondents.
2. The writ petition has been filed against the order of Deputy Director of Consolidation dated 31.12.2013 passed in revision arising out of proceedings under Section 12 of UP Consolidation of Holdings Act (herein after referred to as the 'Act').
3. The dispute related to the mutation of the name of the petitioner over plot no. 465 of village Mathauli, pargana Mahuli Paschim, distt. Basti. This plot was left as out of consolidation during consolidation proceeding. An area of 0.019 hectare of this plot has been recorded in the name of Ramesh Chand Pal, and Gangesh Pal in khata no. 383. Similarly, an area of 0.019 hectare of this plot was recorded in the name of Ramesh Chand Pal, Jai Shanker Pal s/o Vishwanath Pal, Prem Shankar Pal S/o Paras Nath Pal , Girijesh Pal, Gyanendra Pal, Umesh Pal in khata no. 161. The petitioner purchased 1/2 share on plot no. 465 from Ramesh Chand Pal through a sale deed dated 25.8.2003 on the same day the petitioner obtained another sale deed from Girjesh Pal in respect of his 1/6 share of plot no 465. On the basis of two sale deeds the pet
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.