Key Points: - The mutation proceedings cannot be stayed during pendency of another mutation case at the revisional stage; status quo does not stay subsequent mutation proceedings [25000741850010][25000741850012] - Mutation entry does not confer title; the person recorded is liable to pay land revenue [25000741850008] - Proceedings under Section 34 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act have fiscal connotations and are to be decided irrespective of regular title proceedings [25000741850008] - Order of status quo is separate from mutation proceedings and does not prevent mutation or sale deeds executed in violation of status quo [25000741850011][25000741850012] - The writ petition challenging the stay of mutation proceedings lacks merit and is dismissed [25000741850013] - Revision and impugned orders need not be interfered with where mutation authority has acted within its scope [25000741850008]

What is the effect of mutation proceedings on stay of other mutation or title proceedings under the U.P. Land Revenue Act?

What is the status and binding effect of a status quo order on mutation proceedings and subsequent transactions?

What are the rights of the recorded tenure holder to pay land revenue versus conferment of title through mutation entries?